The dispute lies in the interpretation of the line between Runn of Kutch and Sindh as depicted?
Correct answer: C. both of them
- A. 1914 map
- B. 1925 map
- C. both of them
- D. None of them
Explanation
The dispute stems from differing interpretations of the boundary shown in the 1914 and 1925 documents and maps concerning Sindh and Kutch. Both are therefore relevant to the competing claims.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Foreign Policy of Pakistan
205 free Foreign Policy of Pakistan MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Foreign Policy of Pakistan questions
When a verdict under the arbitration was reached which saw Pakistan getting 10% of its claim of 9000 sq. km.
To solve the problem of Sir Creek, which proposal Pakistan gave to India that India has rejected?
Which country proposed a seaward approach, viz, until the boundary is formalized in the Sir creek?
What is the total length of Sir Greek?
What is the significance of Sir Creek for which India and Pakistan are fighting for this Swampy land?
The dialogue process between India and Pakistan on Sir Creek issue is continuing. When the last composite dialogue between both countries were scheduled but ended in failure?