In determining causation in a criminal case, what usually breaks the link between the accused's conduct and the prohibited result?

Correct answer: D. An independent intervening act that is not reasonably foreseeable

  • A. A normal reaction by the victim
  • B. A delay between the act and the result
  • C. The accused's failure to confess
  • D. An independent intervening act that is not reasonably foreseeable

Explanation

Criminal causation generally requires the accused's conduct to remain an effective cause of the result. An independent and unforeseeable intervening act may break the chain, while delay or refusal to confess does not do so by itself.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Criminal Law

Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.

Practise Criminal Law

1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this

Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Criminal Law questions