Humanitarian intervention:
Correct answer: A. Justifies the use of force and breach of sovereignty based on human security grounds
- A. Justifies the use of force and breach of sovereignty based on human security grounds
- B. Argues that human security does not exist
- C. Argues that national security does not exist
- D. a and c
Explanation
Humanitarian intervention holds that severe threats to human life or rights can justify external military force despite the target state’s sovereignty. It does not deny the existence of either human security or national security.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
Practise Conflict and Security Studies
422 free Conflict and Security Studies MCQs from International Relations, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask International Relations questions like this
International Relations is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Conflict and Security Studies questions
Critics of human security charge that:
When does humanitarian intervention secure its greatest legitimization?
What is non-forcible humanitarian intervention?
The contemporary apparent decline in battle deaths may be coming from:
In 1947 'Marshall Plan', a European recovery programme, was announced by US Security of State, George Marshall aimed at providing economic assistance to the European nations in order to help these nations from the post-war shattered economics. Chief interest of USA was to:
'The North Atlantic Treaty established NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization), in: