As a consequence of the unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court in Begum Nusrat Bhutto Vs Chief of Army Staff case, Chief of Army Staff General Zia's act of ousting Bhutto from power was declared to be valid in the name:

Correct answer: C. State necessityConstitutional Law & Civil Rights

  • A. Constitutional supremacy
  • B. Fundamental right
  • C. State necessityConstitutional Law & Civil Rights
  • D. High treason

Explanation

In Begum Nusrat Bhutto v. Chief of Army Staff, General Zia’s takeover was validated under the doctrine of state necessity. It was not treated as constitutional supremacy, a fundamental right, or high treason.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

About Constitutional Law

The Constitution defines the powers and relationships of the legislature, executive and judiciary, while establishing federalism, provincial autonomy and the legal framework of the state. Coverage includes fundamental rights, principles of policy, constitutional offices, judicial review, emergency provisions, elections and the procedure for constitutional amendments, with attention to Pakistan’s constitutional structure.

Practise Constitutional Law

377 free Constitutional Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this

Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Constitutional Law questions