Accused has _________ right to advance arguments?
Correct answer: B. Statutory
- A. Natural
- B. Statutory
- C. Constitutional
- D. None of above
Explanation
The accused's opportunity to address or advance arguments is a procedural entitlement created by criminal-procedure law, so it is statutory. It is not ordinarily classified as an independent constitutional right for this section-based question.
Report an error
The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.
Prefer email? [email protected]
About Criminal Law
Criminal law identifies offences against the state, persons and property, and explains the requirements of actus reus and mens rea for establishing liability. It also covers stages of crime, abetment, attempt, joint and common intention, general exceptions, criminal responsibility and punishments, distinguishing substantive offences from criminal procedure.
Practise Criminal Law
1,518 free Criminal Law MCQs from Law and Constitution, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.
Discussion
Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.
Exams that ask Law and Constitution questions like this
Law and Constitution is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.
More Criminal Law questions
The right given to accused under section 340, Cr.P.C is his _________ right?
Section 265-F, of Cr.P.C deals with_________________?
Section 342, deals with power of Court to examine the _________________?
Evidence of accomplice is not admissible in_________________?
Section 337 Cr.P.C. deals with_______________?
Section 265 D, deals with _________ at trial before Court of Session?