According to Dr. Frances Pritchett's version of Shamsur Rahman Faruqi's "The Historical Novel and the Historical Narrative", what is the difference between a historical narrative and a historical novel ?

Correct answer: C. A historical novel focuses on providing the reader with only the central truth of a historical event, while a historical narrative attempts to tell the entire truth of a historical event.

  • A. A historical narrative and a historical novel are the same thing.
  • B. A historical narrative tells only part of the story surrounding a historical event; a historical novel tells the whole story.
  • C. A historical novel focuses on providing the reader with only the central truth of a historical event, while a historical narrative attempts to tell the entire truth of a historical event.
  • D. Faruqi actually argues that historical novels do not exist.

Explanation

In Faruqi's distinction, historical narrative aims at the entire truth of an event, whereas historical fiction selects and shapes a central truth through imaginative reconstruction. This makes option c the closest formulation.

Written and checked by , editorLast updated
Report an error

The more specific you are, the faster it gets fixed. A source beats an opinion.

Prefer email? [email protected]

Practise Postcolonial and Pakistani Literature

39 free Postcolonial and Pakistani Literature MCQs from English Literature, each with the correct answer and an explanation. Unlimited attempts, no account needed.

Discussion

Stuck on an option, or know a faster way to get there? Ask or explain it here.

No comments yet. Be the first to explain this one.

Exams that ask English Literature questions like this

English Literature is on 2 papers prepared for on TestUstad, and all of them draw the same bank, so this question is worth knowing for every one of them.

More Postcolonial and Pakistani Literature questions