All Free English MCQs with Answers

• A. You would come before dark. The road is a bit dangerous.
• B. You should come before dark. The road is a bit dangerous.
• C. You had come before dark. The road is a bit dangerous.
• D. You could come before dark. The road is a bit dangerous.

Explanation: This sentence expresses a strong recommendation or advice to come before dark due to the dangerous road conditions. "Should" implies a recommendation or obligation based on safety concerns. Considering the context of advising someone due to dangerous road conditions, the most appropriate sentence is: You should come before dark. The road is a bit dangerous.

• A. The professor told her class that a good way to improve listening skills was to watch television, especially news programs and documentaries.
• B. The professor told her class that a good way to improve listening skills is to watch television, especially news programs and documentaries.
• C. The professor told to her class that a good way to improve listening skills was to watch television, specially news programs and documentaries.
• D. The professor said her class that a good way to improve listening skills is to watch television, especially news programs and documentaries.

Explanation: This sentence uses the past tense ("was") to report what the professor said to her class. It correctly communicates that the advice was given in the past

• A. I'm going to have my DVD player repair next week by a friend of mine, who's an electrician.
• B. I'm going to have my DVD player repaired next week by a friend of mine, who's an electrician.
• C. I'm going to have my DVD player to repair next week by a friend of mine, who's an electrician.
• D. I'm going to have my DVD player repairing next week by a friend of mine, who's an electrician.

Explanation: This sentence is correct. It uses the past participle "repaired" after "have" to indicate that the DVD player will be repaired by someone else in the future.

• A. If any one dared suggested that he or she was not against women but only against reservation, nobody was wiling to listen.
• B. If any one was dared suggest that he or she was not against women but only against reservation, nobody was wiling to listen.
• C. If any one was dared suggesting that he or she was not against women but only against reservation, nobody was wiling to listen.
• D. If any one dared suggest that he or she was not against women but only against reservation, nobody was wiling to listen.

Explanation: This sentence is correct. It uses the correct form "dared suggest" in the conditional clause to express the idea that if anyone dared to suggest something, nobody was willing to listen. "Willing" is also corrected to "willing."Therefore, the correct sentence is: If anyone dared suggest that he or she was not against women but only against reservation, nobody was willing to listen.

• A. If you ask her more politely, she might help you.
• B. If you asked her more politely, she might have helped you.
• C. If you asked her more politely, she might help you.
• D. If you would ask her more politely, she might help you.

Explanation: This sentence is in the past simple tense. It suggests a hypothetical situation in the present or future: if you asked politely (in the present or future), there is a possibility she will help you (in the present or future). Based on standard usage and clarity of expressing the condition and its hypothetical result, the correct option is C: If you asked her more politely, she might help you.

• A. According to the police report, it was abundantly clear to every one involved that the priceless diamond stolen sometime during the night.
• B. According to the police report, it was abundantly clear to every one involved that the priceless diamond had been stoled sometime during the night.
• C. According to the police report, it was abundantly clear to every one involves that the priceless diamond had been stolen sometime during the night.
• D. According to the police report, it was abundantly clear to every one involved that the priceless diamond had been stolen sometime during the night.

Explanation: The correct answer is option D, which uses the past perfect passive voice 'had been stolen' to indicate that the theft happened prior to the reference time in the sentence. The other options are incorrect for the following reasons: Option A lacks the necessary auxiliary verb for passive voice; Option B uses the incorrect past participle 'stoled'; and Option C misuses 'involves' instead of 'involved,' disrupting the tense agreement.

• A. put ... away
• B. put ... off
• C. put ... out
• D. put ... over

Explanation: The correct answer is put ... out, which specifically refers to the action of extinguishing a fire. The context of the question highlights the intensity of the fire and the effort required by the firefighters, making this phrasal verb the most appropriate choice. The other options are incorrect because:put ... away does not relate to fire extinguishing but rather to storing things.put ... off implies a delay, which is not relevant in this scenario.put ... over refers to communication or presentation, which is not applicable in the context of fighting a fire.

• A. turned ... down
• B. turned ... over
• C. turned ... out
• D. turned ... up

Explanation: The correct answer is turned ... down. This verb phrase indicates that everyone rejected the proposal because it was deemed too strange. The other options do not convey the correct reaction to the proposal:turned ... over: Suggests deliberation rather than rejection.turned ... out: Refers to results, not reactions.turned ... up: Implies arrival, which is irrelevant in this context.Thus, the only option that accurately reflects the sentiment expressed in the sentence is 'turned ... down.'

• A. go over
• B. go up
• C. go after
• D. go into

Explanation: The correct answer is 'go over' because it implies reviewing or discussing the topic, which is what the teacher is asking the student to do before the next class. The other options do not fit the context as effectively. 'Go up' suggests an increase, 'go after' implies pursuit, and 'go into' could mean discussing in detail but lacks the clarity of 'go over' in this educational context.

• A. break into
• B. bear up
• C. get over
• D. put across

Explanation: The correct answer is get over, as it specifically refers to the process of recovering from emotional distress, aligning perfectly with the context of the sentence where the subject is dealing with the pain of loss. The other options do not convey the same sense of emotional recovery: break into refers to entering forcefully, bear up means to endure but not necessarily to recover, and put across pertains to communication rather than emotional healing.